Of Justification

Westminster Confession of Faith · 11.1–11.6

11.1. Of Justification

Those whom God effectually calleth, He also freely justifieth; not by infusing righteousness into them, but by pardoning their sins, and by accounting and accepting their persons as righteous, not for anything wrought in them, or done by them, but for Christ’s sake alone; nor by imputing faith itself, the act of believing, or any other evangelical obedience to them, as their righteousness, but by imputing the obedience and satisfaction of Christ unto them, they receiving and resting on Him and His righteousness by faith; which faith they have not of themselves, it is the gift of God.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited Rom. 8:30 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 15 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WSC Q33 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. WLC Q70 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WSC Q33 · WLC Q70 · WLC Q71 · WLC Q72 · WLC Q73 · HC Q59 · BC 6.1 · BC 6.2 · BC 6.3 · SC60 5.1 · SC60 5.2 · SC60 5.3 · SC60 5.4 · IAR 5.6 · SHC 5.1 · SHC 5.2 · SHC 5.3

Leader's notes

A Commentary on the Confession of Faith (A.A. Hodge): These Sections teach the following propositions : 1st. All those and only those whom God has eifectually called he also freely justifies. 2d. This justification is a purely judicial act of God as Judge, whereby he pardons all the sins of a believer, and accounts, accepts and treats him as a person righteous in the eye of the divine law. 21 * 245 3d. That this justifying act proceeds upon the imputation or crediting to the believer by God of the righteousness of his great Eepresentative and Surety, Jesus Christ. 4th. That the essential and sole condition upon which this righteousness of Christ is imputed to the believer is, that he exercises faith in or on Christ as his righteousness…

An Exposition of the Confession of Faith (Robert Shaw): I The doctrine of justification by faith holds a most imI portant place in the Christian system. It was justly termed by Luther, articuliis stantis xel cadentis ecclesice — the test of a standing or of a falling Church. In the Church of Rome this doctrine was most grossly corrupted ; and it was eminently through the preaching of the scriptural doctrine of justification that the reformation from Popery was effected. Even in the Protestant Churches, however, pernicious errors in regard to this subject have been widely disseminated, and at difi^erent periods have produced much acrimonious controversy. In our Confession, the scriptural doctrine of justification is accurately discriminated from the various forms of error ; and, in the progress of…

11.2. Of Justification

Faith, thus receiving and resting on Christ and His righteousness, is the alone instrument of justification; yet is it not alone in the person justified, but is ever accompanied with all other saving graces, and is no dead faith, but worketh by love.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited John 1:12 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 5 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WSC Q33 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. WLC Q70 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WSC Q33 · WLC Q70 · WLC Q71 · WLC Q72 · WLC Q73 · HC Q59 · BC 6.1 · BC 6.2 · BC 6.3 · 1689 11.1 · SC60 5.1 · SC60 5.2 · SC60 5.3 · SC60 5.4 · IAR 5.6 · SHC 5.1 · SHC 5.2 · SHC 5.3 · SD 11.1

Leader's notes

A Commentary on the Confession of Faith (A.A. Hodge): These Sections teach the following propositions : 1st. All those and only those whom God has eifectually called he also freely justifies. 2d. This justification is a purely judicial act of God as Judge, whereby he pardons all the sins of a believer, and accounts, accepts and treats him as a person righteous in the eye of the divine law. 21 * 245 3d. That this justifying act proceeds upon the imputation or crediting to the believer by God of the righteousness of his great Eepresentative and Surety, Jesus Christ. 4th. That the essential and sole condition upon which this righteousness of Christ is imputed to the believer is, that he exercises faith in or on Christ as his righteousness…

An Exposition of the Confession of Faith (Robert Shaw): I The doctrine of justification by faith holds a most imI portant place in the Christian system. It was justly termed by Luther, articuliis stantis xel cadentis ecclesice — the test of a standing or of a falling Church. In the Church of Rome this doctrine was most grossly corrupted ; and it was eminently through the preaching of the scriptural doctrine of justification that the reformation from Popery was effected. Even in the Protestant Churches, however, pernicious errors in regard to this subject have been widely disseminated, and at difi^erent periods have produced much acrimonious controversy. In our Confession, the scriptural doctrine of justification is accurately discriminated from the various forms of error ; and, in the progress of…

11.3. Of Justification

Christ, by His obedience and death, did fully discharge the debt of all those that are thus justified, and did make a proper, real, and full satisfaction to His Father’s justice in their behalf. Yet, inasmuch as He was given by the Father for them; and His obedience and satisfaction accepted in their stead; and both freely, not for anything in them; their justification is only of free grace; that both the exact justice, and rich grace of God, might be glorified in the justification of sinners.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited Rom. 5:8, 9, 10, 19 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 13 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WSC Q33 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. WLC Q70 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WSC Q33 · WLC Q70 · WLC Q71 · WLC Q72 · WLC Q73 · HC Q59 · BC 6.1 · BC 6.2 · BC 6.3 · 1689 11.1 · SC60 5.1 · SC60 5.2 · SC60 5.3 · SC60 5.4 · IAR 5.6 · SHC 5.1 · SHC 5.2 · SHC 5.3 · SD 11.1

Leader's notes

A Commentary on the Confession of Faith (A.A. Hodge): This Section teaches that justification changes radically and permanently the relation which the subject of it sustains both to God and to the demands of the divine law, viewed as a condition of favour. Before justification, God is an angry Judge, holding the sentence of the condemning law for a season in suspense. After justification, the law instead of condemning acquits, and demands that the subject be regarded and treated like a son, as i provided in the eternal covenant, and God, as a loving Father, proceeds to execute all the kind offices which belong to the new relation. This requires, of course, discipline and correction, as well as instruction and consolation. All suffering is either mere calamity, when viewed…

An Exposition of the Confession of Faith (Robert Shaw): Socinians deny that Christ made any real and proper satisfaction to divine justice in behalf of his people ; and their grand objection to this doctrine is, that it leaves no room for the exercise of grace in the salvation of sinners. Many modern writers, of a different class, deny that Christ satisfied retributive justice, and insist that he only satisfied public jus- » See Owen on Justification, ch. xx. ; Dick's Lectures, vol. iii., pp 380-385 ; Hill's Lectures, vol. ii.. pp. 284,285 ; Tiirretin's Inst. Thee, L. 16, Q. 8; also Turretin's Exerc. Theol. text.— De Concord. Paul, et Jac. 134 CONFESSION OF FAITH. [[c HA P. XT. tice ; consequently, they must maintain, that he neither discharged…

11.4. Of Justification

God did, from all eternity, decree to justify all the elect, and Christ did, in the fulness of time, die for their sins, and rise again for their justification: nevertheless, they are not justified, until the Holy Spirit doth, in due time, actually apply Christ unto them.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited Gal. 3:8 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 9 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WSC Q33 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. WLC Q70 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WSC Q33 · WLC Q70 · WLC Q71 · WLC Q72 · WLC Q73 · HC Q59 · BC 6.1 · BC 6.2 · BC 6.3 · 1689 11.1 · SC60 5.1 · SC60 5.2 · SC60 5.3 · SC60 5.4 · IAR 5.6 · SHC 5.1 · SHC 5.2 · SHC 5.3 · SD 11.1

Leader's notes

A Commentary on the Confession of Faith (A.A. Hodge): This Section teaches that justification changes radically and permanently the relation which the subject of it sustains both to God and to the demands of the divine law, viewed as a condition of favour. Before justification, God is an angry Judge, holding the sentence of the condemning law for a season in suspense. After justification, the law instead of condemning acquits, and demands that the subject be regarded and treated like a son, as i provided in the eternal covenant, and God, as a loving Father, proceeds to execute all the kind offices which belong to the new relation. This requires, of course, discipline and correction, as well as instruction and consolation. All suffering is either mere calamity, when viewed…

An Exposition of the Confession of Faith (Robert Shaw): This section is directed against the Antinomian error, that the elect were justified from eternity, or when the price of their redemption was paid by Christ. It is readily admitted that God, from eternity, decreed to justify the elect ; but till the period of effectual caUing they are in a state of wrath and condemnation.— Eph. ii.3; John iii. 18. The righteousness by which they are justified was perfected in Christ's death, and the perfection of it was declared by his resurrection, and they may be said to have been virtually justified when Christ was acquitted and discharged as their head and representative ; nevertheless, they are not actually and formally justified until they are vitally united to Christ…

11.5. Of Justification

God doth continue to forgive the sins of those that are justified: and although they can never fall from the state of justification; yet they may, by their sins, fall under God’s fatherly displeasure, and not have the light of His countenance restored unto them, until they humble themselves, confess their sins, beg pardon, and renew their faith and repentance.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited Matt. 6:12 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 12 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WSC Q33 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. WLC Q70 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WSC Q33 · WLC Q70 · WLC Q71 · WLC Q72 · WLC Q73 · HC Q59 · BC 6.1 · BC 6.2 · BC 6.3 · 1689 11.1 · SC60 5.1 · SC60 5.2 · SC60 5.3 · SC60 5.4 · IAR 5.6 · SHC 5.1 · SHC 5.2 · SHC 5.3 · SD 11.1

Leader's notes

A Commentary on the Confession of Faith (A.A. Hodge): This Section teaches that justification changes radically and permanently the relation which the subject of it sustains both to God and to the demands of the divine law, viewed as a condition of favour. Before justification, God is an angry Judge, holding the sentence of the condemning law for a season in suspense. After justification, the law instead of condemning acquits, and demands that the subject be regarded and treated like a son, as i provided in the eternal covenant, and God, as a loving Father, proceeds to execute all the kind offices which belong to the new relation. This requires, of course, discipline and correction, as well as instruction and consolation. All suffering is either mere calamity, when viewed…

An Exposition of the Confession of Faith (Robert Shaw): As justification is an act completed at once, so those who are justified cannot come into condemnation : " There is now no condemnation to them that are in Christ Jesus." — Rora. viii. 1. The sins which they afterwards commit cannot revoke the pardon which God has graciously given them ; but they may subject them to his fatherly displeasure, and to temporary chastisements. — Ps. Ixxxix. 30—33. Here we must advert to the well-known distinction between judicial and /atJierly forgiveness. Though God, m the capacity of a judge. 1 36 CONFESSION OF FAITH. QcHAP. XI. pardons all the sins of believers, in the most free and unconditional manner, in the day of their justification, yet that forgiveness which…

11.6. Of Justification

The justification of believers under the old testament was, in all these respects, one and the same with the justification of believers under the new testament.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited Gal. 3:9, 13, 14 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 3 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WSC Q33 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. WLC Q70 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WSC Q33 · WLC Q70 · WLC Q71 · WLC Q72 · WLC Q73 · HC Q59 · BC 6.1 · BC 6.2 · BC 6.3 · 1689 11.1 · SC60 5.1 · SC60 5.2 · SC60 5.3 · SC60 5.4 · IAR 5.6 · SHC 5.1 · SHC 5.2 · SHC 5.3 · SD 11.1

Leader's notes

A Commentary on the Confession of Faith (A.A. Hodge): Section VI.— The justification of believers under the OljJ Testament was, in all these respects, one and the same with the justification of believers under the New Testament." IT Gal. iii. 9, 13, 14; Rom. iv. 22-24; Heb. xiii. 8. The truth taught in this Section has already been fully proved above, under Chapter vii., §§ 4, 5 and 6 ; and Chapter viii., § 6. 22*

An Exposition of the Confession of Faith (Robert Shaw): The reverse of this is maintained by Socinians. We shall only observe, that though " the rigliteousness of God" is now more clearly manifested by the gospel, yet it was " witnessed by the law and the prophets." — Rom. iii. 21. And those, under the Old Testament, who laid hold upon that righteousness by faith, were as really and fully justified as believers under the New Testament. Paul, accordingly, adduces the justification of Abraham as an example of the method in which believers in all ages must be justified. — Rom. iv. 3. Though the everlasting righteousness was not actually brought in until Christ " became obedient unto death," yet the efficacy of his death extended to believers under…