Christ the Mediator

Westminster Larger Catechism · Q30–Q56

Q30. Doth God leave all mankind to perish in the estate of sin and misery?

God doth not leave all men to perish in the estate of sin and misery, into which they fell by the breach of the first covenant, commonly called the Covenant of Works; but of his mere love and mercy delivereth his elect out of it, and bringeth them into an estate of salvation by the second covenant, commonly called the Covenant of Grace.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited 1 Thess. 5:9 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 5 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. HC Q29 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. BC 5.2 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

HC Q29 · BC 5.2 · BC 5.3 · BC 5.4 · BC 5.5 · BC 5.6

Leader's notes

A Body of Divinity (Thomas Ridgley): Quest. XXX. QUEST. XXX. Doth God leave all mankind to perish in the state of sin and misery? ANSW. God will not leave all mankind to perish in the state of sin and misery, into which they fell by the breach of the first covenant, commonly called, the covenant of works; but of his mere love and mercy, delivereth his elect out of it, and bringeth them to an estate of salvation by the second covenant, commonly called the covenant of grace. Hitherto we have considered man as made upright, and having many blessings in possession, and more in expectation, according to the tenor of the covenant he was under. We have also observed the first entrance of sin into…

Q31. With whom was the covenant of grace made?

The covenant of grace was made with Christ as the second Adam, and in him with all the elect as his seed.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited Gal. 3:16 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 3 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. HC Q29 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. BC 5.2 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

HC Q29 · BC 5.2 · BC 5.3 · BC 5.4 · BC 5.5 · BC 5.6 · 1689 7.1 · 1689 7.2 · 1689 7.3

Leader's notes

A Body of Divinity (Thomas Ridgley): Quest. XXXI. QUEST. XXXI. With whom was the covenant of grace made? ANSW. The covenant of grace was made with Christ as the second Adam; and in him, with all the elect, as his seed. As the covenant of grace is opposed to that which was made with Adam, as the head of mankind, so it is considered in this answer, as made with the second Adam, and, in him, with all his elect, who are described, by the Psalmist, as a seed that should serve him, which should be accounted to the Lord for a generation, Psal. xxii. 30. and the prophet Isaiah, speaking of them, says, He shall see his seed, Isa. liii. 10. In explaining this answer…

Q32. How is the grace of God manifested in the second covenant?

The grace of God is manifested in the second covenant, in that he freely provideth and offereth to sinners a Mediator, and life and salvation by him; and requiring faith as the condition to interest them in him, promiseth and giveth his Holy Spirit to all his elect, to work in them that faith, with all other saving graces; and to enable them unto all holy obedience, as the evidence of the truth of their faith and thankfulness to God, and as the way which he hath appointed them to salvation.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited Gen. 3:15 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 11 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WCF 7.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. HC Q29 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WCF 7.1 · HC Q29 · BC 5.2 · BC 5.3 · BC 5.4 · BC 5.5 · BC 5.6 · 1689 7.1 · 1689 7.2 · 1689 7.3

Leader's notes

A Body of Divinity (Thomas Ridgley): Quest. XXXII. QUEST. XXXII. How is the grace of God manifested in the second covenant? ANSW. The grace of God is manifested in the second covenant in that he freely provideth, and offereth to sinners a Mediator, and life and salvation by him; and requiring faith as the condition to interest them in him, promiseth and giveth his Holy Spirit to all his elect, to work in them that faith, with all other saving graces, and to enable them unto all holy obedience, as the evidence of the truth of their faith and thankfulness to God, and as the way which he hath appointed to salvation. Since the covenant, which we have begun to consider, is called the covenant of…

Q33. Was the covenant of grace always administered after one and the same manner?

The covenant of grace was not always administered after the same manner, but the administrations of it under the Old Testament were different from those under the New.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited 2 Cor. 3:6-9 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. WSC Q20 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  3. WCF 7.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. The Assembly divided over this: The Mosaic Covenant. Sinai: republication of the covenant of works, or administration of the covenant of grace? What turns on the answer?

Read alongside

WSC Q20 · WCF 7.1 · HC Q29 · BC 5.2 · BC 5.3 · BC 5.4 · BC 5.5 · BC 5.6 · 1689 7.1 · 1689 7.2 · 1689 7.3

Leader's notes

A Body of Divinity (Thomas Ridgley): Quest. XXXIII., XXXIV., XXXV. QUEST. XXXIII. Was the covenant of grace always administered after one and the same manner? ANSW. The covenant of grace was not always administered after the same manner; but the administrations of it, under the Old Testament, were different from those under the New. QUEST. XXXIV. How was the covenant of grace administered under the Old Testament. ANSW. The covenant of grace was administered under the Old Testament, by promises, prophecies, sacrifices, circumcision, the passover, and other types and ordinances, which did all fore-signify Christ then to come, and were, for that time, sufficient to build up the elect in faith in the promised Messiah, by whom they then had full remission of sin, and eternal…

Q34. How was the covenant of grace administered under the Old Testament?

The covenant of grace was administered under the Old Testament, by promises, prophecies, sacrifices, circumcision, the passover, and other types and ordinances, which did all foresignify Christ then to come, and were for that time sufficient to build up the elect in faith in the promised Messiah, by whom they then had full remission of sin, and eternal salvation.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited Rom. 15:8 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 9 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WSC Q20 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. WCF 7.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WSC Q20 · WCF 7.1 · HC Q29 · BC 5.2 · BC 5.3 · BC 5.4 · BC 5.5 · BC 5.6 · 1689 7.1 · 1689 7.2 · 1689 7.3

Leader's notes

A Body of Divinity (Thomas Ridgley): Quest. XXXIII., XXXIV., XXXV. QUEST. XXXIII. Was the covenant of grace always administered after one and the same manner? ANSW. The covenant of grace was not always administered after the same manner; but the administrations of it, under the Old Testament, were different from those under the New. QUEST. XXXIV. How was the covenant of grace administered under the Old Testament. ANSW. The covenant of grace was administered under the Old Testament, by promises, prophecies, sacrifices, circumcision, the passover, and other types and ordinances, which did all fore-signify Christ then to come, and were, for that time, sufficient to build up the elect in faith in the promised Messiah, by whom they then had full remission of sin, and eternal…

Q35. How is the covenant of grace administered under the New Testament?

Under the New Testament, when Christ the substance was exhibited, the same covenant of grace was and still is to be administered in the preaching of the word, and the administration of the sacraments of Baptism and the Lord's Supper; in which grace and salvation are held forth in more fulness, evidence, and efficacy, to all nations.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited Mark 16:15 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 6 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WSC Q20 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. WCF 7.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WSC Q20 · WCF 7.1 · HC Q29 · BC 5.2 · BC 5.3 · BC 5.4 · BC 5.5 · BC 5.6 · 1689 7.1 · 1689 7.2 · 1689 7.3

Leader's notes

A Body of Divinity (Thomas Ridgley): Quest. XXXIII., XXXIV., XXXV. QUEST. XXXIII. Was the covenant of grace always administered after one and the same manner? ANSW. The covenant of grace was not always administered after the same manner; but the administrations of it, under the Old Testament, were different from those under the New. QUEST. XXXIV. How was the covenant of grace administered under the Old Testament. ANSW. The covenant of grace was administered under the Old Testament, by promises, prophecies, sacrifices, circumcision, the passover, and other types and ordinances, which did all fore-signify Christ then to come, and were, for that time, sufficient to build up the elect in faith in the promised Messiah, by whom they then had full remission of sin, and eternal…

Q36. Who is the Mediator of the covenant of grace?

The only Mediator of the covenant of grace is the Lord Jesus Christ, who, being the eternal Son of God, of one substance and equal with the Father, in the fulness of time became man, and so was and continues to be God and man, in two entire distinct natures, and one person, forever.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited 1 Tim. 2:5 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 9 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. HC Q29 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. HC Q37 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

HC Q29 · HC Q37 · BC 5.2 · BC 5.3 · BC 5.4 · BC 5.5 · BC 5.6 · CD 2.1

Leader's notes

A Body of Divinity (Thomas Ridgley): Quest. XXXVI., XXXVII. QUEST. XXXVI. Who is the Mediator of the Covenant of Grace? ANSW. The only mediator of the covenant of grace is the Lord Jesus Christ, who being the eternal Son of God, of one substance and equal with the Father, in the fulness of time became man, and so was and continues to be God and Man, in two entire distinct natures, and one Person for ever. QUEST. XXXVII. How did Christ, being God, become Man? ANSW. Christ, the Son of God, became Man by taking to himself a true body, and a reasonable soul, being conceived by the power of the Holy Ghost, in the womb of the Virgin Mary, of her substance, and born of…

Q37. How did Christ, being the Son of God, become man?

Christ the Son of God became man, by taking to himself a true body, and a reasonable soul, being conceived by the power of the Holy Ghost in the womb of the virgin Mary, of her substance, and born of her, yet without sin.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited John 1:14 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 6 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WSC Q21 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. HC Q29 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WSC Q21 · HC Q29 · HC Q37 · BC 5.2 · BC 5.3 · BC 5.4 · BC 5.5 · BC 5.6 · CD 2.1 · 1689 8.1

Leader's notes

A Body of Divinity (Thomas Ridgley): Quest. XXXVI., XXXVII. QUEST. XXXVI. Who is the Mediator of the Covenant of Grace? ANSW. The only mediator of the covenant of grace is the Lord Jesus Christ, who being the eternal Son of God, of one substance and equal with the Father, in the fulness of time became man, and so was and continues to be God and Man, in two entire distinct natures, and one Person for ever. QUEST. XXXVII. How did Christ, being God, become Man? ANSW. Christ, the Son of God, became Man by taking to himself a true body, and a reasonable soul, being conceived by the power of the Holy Ghost, in the womb of the Virgin Mary, of her substance, and born of…

Q38. Why was it requisite that the Mediator should be God?

It was requisite that the Mediator should be God, that he might sustain and keep the human nature from sinking under the infinite wrath of God, and the power of death; give worth and efficacy to his sufferings, obedience, and intercession; and to satisfy God's justice, procure his favor, purchase a peculiar people, give his Spirit to them, conquer all their enemies, and bring them to everlasting salvation.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited Acts 2:24-25 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 15 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WSC Q21 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. HC Q29 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WSC Q21 · HC Q29 · HC Q37 · BC 5.2 · BC 5.3 · BC 5.4 · BC 5.5 · BC 5.6 · CD 2.1 · 1689 8.1

Leader's notes

A Body of Divinity (Thomas Ridgley): Quest. XXXVIII., XXXIX., XL. QUEST. XXXVIII. Why was it requisite that the Mediator should be God? ANSW. It was requisite that the Mediator should be God, that he might sustain and keep the human nature from sinking under the infinite wrath of God, and the power of death, give worth and efficacy to his sufferings, obedience, and intercession; and so satisfy God’s justice, procure his favour, purchase a peculiar people, give his Spirit to them, conquer all their enemies, and bring them to everlasting salvation. QUEST. XXXIX. Why was it requisite that the Mediator should be Man? ANSW. It was requisite that the Mediator should be Man, that he might advance our nature, perform obedience to the law, suffer, and…

Q39. Why was it requisite that the Mediator should be man?

It was requisite that the Mediator should be man, that he might advance our nature, perform obedience to the law, suffer and make intercession for us in our nature, have a fellow feeling of our infirmities; that we might receive the adoption of sons, and have comfort and access with boldness unto the throne of grace.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited Heb. 2:16 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 7 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WSC Q21 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. HC Q29 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WSC Q21 · HC Q29 · HC Q37 · BC 5.2 · BC 5.3 · BC 5.4 · BC 5.5 · BC 5.6 · CD 2.1 · 1689 8.1

Leader's notes

A Body of Divinity (Thomas Ridgley): Quest. XXXVIII., XXXIX., XL. QUEST. XXXVIII. Why was it requisite that the Mediator should be God? ANSW. It was requisite that the Mediator should be God, that he might sustain and keep the human nature from sinking under the infinite wrath of God, and the power of death, give worth and efficacy to his sufferings, obedience, and intercession; and so satisfy God’s justice, procure his favour, purchase a peculiar people, give his Spirit to them, conquer all their enemies, and bring them to everlasting salvation. QUEST. XXXIX. Why was it requisite that the Mediator should be Man? ANSW. It was requisite that the Mediator should be Man, that he might advance our nature, perform obedience to the law, suffer, and…

Q40. Why was it requisite that the Mediator should be God and man in one person ?

It was requisite that the Mediator, who was to reconcile God and man, should himself be both God and man, and this in one person, that the proper works of each nature might be accepted of God for us, and relied on by us, as the works of the whole person.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited Matt. 1:21,23 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 4 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WSC Q21 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. WCF 8.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WSC Q21 · WCF 8.1 · HC Q29 · HC Q37 · BC 5.2 · BC 5.3 · BC 5.4 · BC 5.5 · BC 5.6 · CD 2.1 · 1689 8.1

Leader's notes

A Body of Divinity (Thomas Ridgley): Quest. XXXVIII., XXXIX., XL. QUEST. XXXVIII. Why was it requisite that the Mediator should be God? ANSW. It was requisite that the Mediator should be God, that he might sustain and keep the human nature from sinking under the infinite wrath of God, and the power of death, give worth and efficacy to his sufferings, obedience, and intercession; and so satisfy God’s justice, procure his favour, purchase a peculiar people, give his Spirit to them, conquer all their enemies, and bring them to everlasting salvation. QUEST. XXXIX. Why was it requisite that the Mediator should be Man? ANSW. It was requisite that the Mediator should be Man, that he might advance our nature, perform obedience to the law, suffer, and…

Q41. Why was our Mediator called Jesus?

Our Mediator was called Jesus, because he saveth his people from their sins.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited Matt. 1:21 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. WSC Q21 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  3. WCF 8.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WSC Q21 · WCF 8.1 · HC Q29 · HC Q37 · BC 5.2 · BC 5.3 · BC 5.4 · BC 5.5 · BC 5.6 · CD 2.1 · 1689 8.1

Leader's notes

A Body of Divinity (Thomas Ridgley): Quest. XLI., XLII. QUEST. XLI. Why was our Mediator called Jesus? ANSW. Our Mediator was called Jesus, because he saveth his people from their sins. QUEST. XLII. Why was our Mediator called Christ? ANSW. Our Mediator was called Christ, because he was anointed with the Holy Ghost above measure, and so set apart, and fully furnished with all authority and ability, to execute the offices of Prophet, Priest, and King of his church, in the estate both of his humiliation and exaltation. I. Our Mediator is very often called Jesus in the New Testament, which name signifies a Saviour, as it is particularly intimated by the angel, who gave direction, that he should be so called, before his birth, Matt…

Q42. Why was our Mediator called Christ?

Our Mediator was called Christ, because he was anointed with the Holy Ghost above measure; and so set apart, and fully furnished with all authority and ability, to execute the offices of prophet, priest, and king of his church, in the estate both of his humiliation and exaltation.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited John 3:34 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 12 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WSC Q21 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. WCF 8.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WSC Q21 · WCF 8.1 · HC Q29 · HC Q37 · BC 5.2 · BC 5.3 · BC 5.4 · BC 5.5 · BC 5.6 · CD 2.1 · 1689 8.1

Leader's notes

A Body of Divinity (Thomas Ridgley): Quest. XLI., XLII. QUEST. XLI. Why was our Mediator called Jesus? ANSW. Our Mediator was called Jesus, because he saveth his people from their sins. QUEST. XLII. Why was our Mediator called Christ? ANSW. Our Mediator was called Christ, because he was anointed with the Holy Ghost above measure, and so set apart, and fully furnished with all authority and ability, to execute the offices of Prophet, Priest, and King of his church, in the estate both of his humiliation and exaltation. I. Our Mediator is very often called Jesus in the New Testament, which name signifies a Saviour, as it is particularly intimated by the angel, who gave direction, that he should be so called, before his birth, Matt…

Q43. How doth Christ execute the office of a prophet?

Christ executeth the office of a prophet, in his revealing to the church, in all ages, by his Spirit and word, in divers ways of administration, the whole will of God, in all things concerning their edification and salvation.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited John 1:18 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 7 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WSC Q21 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. WCF 8.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WSC Q21 · WCF 8.1 · HC Q29 · HC Q37 · BC 5.2 · BC 5.3 · BC 5.4 · BC 5.5 · BC 5.6 · CD 2.1 · 1689 8.1

Leader's notes

A Body of Divinity (Thomas Ridgley): Quest. XLIII. QUEST. XLIII. How doth Christ execute the office of a Prophet? ANSW. Christ executeth the office of a Prophet, in his revealing to the church, in all ages, by his Spirit and word, in divers ways of administration, the whole will of God, in all things concerning their edification and salvation. That which may be first observed, before we consider the parts of Christ’s prophetical office, and the manner of his executing it, is the order in which it is mentioned, as set before his priestly and kingly offices, which may give us occasion to enquire whether it be executed before them. 1. If we consider the natural order of his executing his three offices, or the dependence…

Q44. How doth Christ execute the office of a priest?

Christ executeth the office of a priest, in his once offering himself a sacrifice without spot to God, to be a reconciliation for the sins of his people; and in making continual intercession for them.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited Heb. 9:14,28 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 3 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WSC Q21 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. WCF 8.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WSC Q21 · WCF 8.1 · HC Q29 · HC Q37 · BC 5.2 · BC 5.3 · BC 5.4 · BC 5.5 · BC 5.6 · CD 2.1 · 1689 8.1

Leader's notes

A Body of Divinity (Thomas Ridgley): Quest. XLIV. QUEST. XLIV. How doth Christ execute the office of a Priest? ANSW. Christ executeth the office of a Priest, in his once offering himself a sacrifice, without spot, to God, to be a reconciliation for the sins of his people, and in making continual intercession for them. In considering Christ’s Priestly office, as described in this answer, we may observe the two great branches thereof, namely, the offering himself a sacrifice; and making intercession. There are several scriptures which expressly mention both of them: thus he is said, through the eternal Spirit, to have offered himself without spot, to God, Heb. ix. 14. and then described as having entered into heaven, now to appear in the presence of…

Q45. How doth Christ execute the office of a king?

Christ executeth the office of a king, in calling out of the world a people to himself, and giving them officers, laws, and censures, by which he visibly governs them; in bestowing saving grace upon his elect, rewarding their obedience, and correcting them for their sins, preserving and supporting them under all their temptations and sufferings, restraining and overcoming all their enemies, and powerfully ordering all things for his own glory, and their good; and also in taking vengeance on the rest, who know not God, and obey not the gospel.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited Acts 15:14-16 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 20 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WSC Q21 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. WCF 8.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WSC Q21 · WCF 8.1 · HC Q29 · HC Q37 · BC 5.2 · BC 5.3 · BC 5.4 · BC 5.5 · BC 5.6 · CD 2.1 · 1689 8.1

Leader's notes

A Body of Divinity (Thomas Ridgley): Quest. XLV. QUEST. XLV. How doth Christ execute the office of a King? ANSWER. Christ executeth the office of a King, in calling out of the world a people to himself, and giving them officers, laws, and censures, by which he visibly governs them, in bestowing saving grace upon his elect, rewarding their obedience, and correcting them for their sins, preserving and supporting them under all their temptations and sufferings, restraining and overcoming all their enemies, and powerfully ordering all things for his own glory, and their own good; and also in taking vengeance on the rest who know not God, and obey not the gospel. A King is a person advanced to the highest dignity; in this sense the…

Q46. What was the estate of Christ's humiliation?

The estate of Christ's humiliation was that low condition, wherein he for our sakes, emptying himself of his glory, took upon him the form of a servant, in his conception and birth, life, death, and after his death, until his resurrection.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited Phil. 2:6-8 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 4 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WSC Q21 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. WCF 8.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WSC Q21 · WCF 8.1 · HC Q29 · HC Q37 · BC 5.2 · BC 5.3 · BC 5.4 · BC 5.5 · BC 5.6 · CD 2.1 · 1689 8.1

Leader's notes

A Body of Divinity (Thomas Ridgley): Quest. XLVI., XLVII., XLVIII. QUEST. XLVI. What was the estate of Christ’s humiliation? ANSW. The estate of Christ’s humiliation was that low condition, wherein he, for our sakes, emptying himself of his glory, took upon him the form of a servant, in his conception and birth, life, death, and, after his death, until his resurrection. QUEST. XLVII. How did Christ humble himself in his conception and birth? ANSW. Christ humbleth himself in his conception, in that, being from all eternity, the Son of God, in the bosom of the Father, he was pleased, in the fulness of time, to become the Son of man, made of a woman of low estate, and to be born of her; with divers circumstances…

Q47. How did Christ humble himself in his conception and birth?

Christ humbled himself in his conception and birth, in that, being from all eternity the Son of God, in the bosom of the Father, he was pleased in the fulness of time to become the son of man, made of a woman of low estate, and to be born of her; with divers circumstances of more than ordinary abasement.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited John 1:14,18 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 3 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WSC Q21 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. WCF 8.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WSC Q21 · WCF 8.1 · HC Q29 · HC Q37 · BC 5.2 · BC 5.3 · BC 5.4 · BC 5.5 · BC 5.6 · CD 2.1 · 1689 8.1

Leader's notes

A Body of Divinity (Thomas Ridgley): Quest. XLVI., XLVII., XLVIII. QUEST. XLVI. What was the estate of Christ’s humiliation? ANSW. The estate of Christ’s humiliation was that low condition, wherein he, for our sakes, emptying himself of his glory, took upon him the form of a servant, in his conception and birth, life, death, and, after his death, until his resurrection. QUEST. XLVII. How did Christ humble himself in his conception and birth? ANSW. Christ humbleth himself in his conception, in that, being from all eternity, the Son of God, in the bosom of the Father, he was pleased, in the fulness of time, to become the Son of man, made of a woman of low estate, and to be born of her; with divers circumstances…

Q48. How did Christ humble himself in his life?

Christ humbled himself in his life, by subjecting himself to the law, which he perfectly fulfilled; and by conflicting with the indignities of the world, temptations of Satan, and infirmities in his flesh, whether common to the nature of man, or particularly accompanying that his low condition.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited Gal. 4:4 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 10 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WSC Q21 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. WCF 8.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WSC Q21 · WCF 8.1 · HC Q29 · HC Q37 · BC 5.2 · BC 5.3 · BC 5.4 · BC 5.5 · BC 5.6 · CD 2.1 · 1689 8.1

Leader's notes

A Body of Divinity (Thomas Ridgley): Quest. XLVI., XLVII., XLVIII. QUEST. XLVI. What was the estate of Christ’s humiliation? ANSW. The estate of Christ’s humiliation was that low condition, wherein he, for our sakes, emptying himself of his glory, took upon him the form of a servant, in his conception and birth, life, death, and, after his death, until his resurrection. QUEST. XLVII. How did Christ humble himself in his conception and birth? ANSW. Christ humbleth himself in his conception, in that, being from all eternity, the Son of God, in the bosom of the Father, he was pleased, in the fulness of time, to become the Son of man, made of a woman of low estate, and to be born of her; with divers circumstances…

Q49. How did Christ humble himself in his death?

Christ humbled himself in his death, in that having been betrayed by Judas, forsaken by his disciples, scorned and rejected by the world, condemned by Pilate, and tormented by his persecutors; having also conflicted with the terrors of death, and the powers of darkness, felt and borne the weight of God's wrath, he laid down his life an offering for sin, enduring the painful, shameful, and cursed death of the cross.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited Matt. 27:4 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 11 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WSC Q21 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. WCF 8.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WSC Q21 · WCF 8.1 · HC Q29 · HC Q37 · BC 5.2 · BC 5.3 · BC 5.4 · BC 5.5 · BC 5.6 · CD 2.1 · 1689 8.1

Leader's notes

A Body of Divinity (Thomas Ridgley): Quest. XLIX., L. QUEST. XLIX. How did Christ humble himself in his death? ANSW. Christ humbled himself in his death, in that having been betrayed by Judas, forsaken by his disciples, scorned and rejected by the world, condemned by Pilate, and tormented by his persecutors, having also conflicted with the terrors of death, and the powers of darkness, felt and borne the weight of God’s wrath, he laid down his life an offering for sin, enduring the painful, shameful, and cursed death of the cross. QUEST. L. Wherein consisted Christ’s humiliation after his death? ANSW. Christ’s humiliation after his death, consisted in his being buried, and continuing in the state of the dead, and under the power of death, till…

Q50. Wherein consisted Christ's humiliation after his death?

Christ's humiliation after his death consisted in his being buried, and continuing in the state of the dead, and under the power of death till the third day; which hath been otherwise expressed in these words, he descended into hell.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited 1 Cor. 15:3-4 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 5 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WSC Q21 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. WCF 8.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WSC Q21 · WCF 8.1 · HC Q29 · HC Q37 · BC 5.2 · BC 5.3 · BC 5.4 · BC 5.5 · BC 5.6 · CD 2.1 · 1689 8.1

Leader's notes

A Body of Divinity (Thomas Ridgley): Quest. XLIX., L. QUEST. XLIX. How did Christ humble himself in his death? ANSW. Christ humbled himself in his death, in that having been betrayed by Judas, forsaken by his disciples, scorned and rejected by the world, condemned by Pilate, and tormented by his persecutors, having also conflicted with the terrors of death, and the powers of darkness, felt and borne the weight of God’s wrath, he laid down his life an offering for sin, enduring the painful, shameful, and cursed death of the cross. QUEST. L. Wherein consisted Christ’s humiliation after his death? ANSW. Christ’s humiliation after his death, consisted in his being buried, and continuing in the state of the dead, and under the power of death, till…

Q51. What was the estate of Christ's exaltation?

The estate of Christ's exaltation comprehendeth his resurrection, ascension, sitting at the right hand of the Father, and his coming again to judge the world.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited 1 Cor. 15:4 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 5 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WSC Q21 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. WCF 8.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WSC Q21 · WCF 8.1 · HC Q29 · HC Q37 · BC 5.2 · BC 5.3 · BC 5.4 · BC 5.5 · BC 5.6 · CD 2.1 · 1689 8.1

Leader's notes

A Body of Divinity (Thomas Ridgley): Quest. LI., LII. QUEST. LI. What was the estate of Christ’s exaltation? ANSW. The estate of Christ’s exaltation comprehendeth his resurrection, ascension, sitting at the right hand of the Father, and his coming again to judge the world. QUEST. LII. How was Christ exalted in his resurrection? ANSW. Christ was exalted in his resurrection, in that, not having seen corruption in death, of which it was not possible for him to be held, and having the very same body in which he suffered, with the essential properties thereof, but without mortality and other common infirmities belonging to this life, really united to his soul, he rose again from the dead the third day, by his own power; whereby he declared…

Q52. How was Christ exalted in his resurrection?

Christ was exalted in his resurrection, in that, not having seen corruption in death (of which it was not possible for him to be held), and having the very same body in which he suffered, with the essential properties thereof (but without mortality, and other common infirmities belonging to this life), really united to his soul, he rose again from the dead the third day by his own power; whereby he declared himself to be the Son of God, to have satisfied divine justice, to have vanquished death, and him that had the power of it, and to be Lord of quick and dead: all which he did as a public person, the head of his church, for their justification, quickening in grace, support against enemies, and to assure them of their resurrection from the dead at the last day.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited Acts 2:24,27 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 17 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WSC Q21 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. WCF 8.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WSC Q21 · WCF 8.1 · HC Q29 · HC Q37 · BC 5.2 · BC 5.3 · BC 5.4 · BC 5.5 · BC 5.6 · CD 2.1 · 1689 8.1

Leader's notes

A Body of Divinity (Thomas Ridgley): Quest. LI., LII. QUEST. LI. What was the estate of Christ’s exaltation? ANSW. The estate of Christ’s exaltation comprehendeth his resurrection, ascension, sitting at the right hand of the Father, and his coming again to judge the world. QUEST. LII. How was Christ exalted in his resurrection? ANSW. Christ was exalted in his resurrection, in that, not having seen corruption in death, of which it was not possible for him to be held, and having the very same body in which he suffered, with the essential properties thereof, but without mortality and other common infirmities belonging to this life, really united to his soul, he rose again from the dead the third day, by his own power; whereby he declared…

Q53. How was Christ exalted in his ascension?

Christ was exalted in his ascension, in that having after his resurrection often appeared unto and conversed with his apostles, speaking to them of the things pertaining to the kingdom of God, and giving them commission to preach the gospel to all nations, forty days after his resurrection, he, in our nature, and as our head, triumphing over enemies, visibly went up into the highest heavens, there to receive gifts for men, to raise up our affections thither, and to prepare a place for us, where himself is, and shall continue till his second coming at the end of the world.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited Acts 1:2-3 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 10 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WSC Q21 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. WCF 8.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WSC Q21 · WCF 8.1 · HC Q29 · HC Q37 · BC 5.2 · BC 5.3 · BC 5.4 · BC 5.5 · BC 5.6 · CD 2.1 · 1689 8.1

Leader's notes

A Body of Divinity (Thomas Ridgley): Quest. LIII., LIV. QUEST. LIII. How was Christ exalted in his ascension? ANSW. Christ was exalted in his ascension, in that having, after his resurrection, often appeared unto, and conversed with his apostles, speaking to them of those things pertaining to the kingdom of God, and giving them commission to preach the gospel to all nations; forty days after his resurrection, he, in our nature, and as our Head, triumphing over enemies, visibly went up into the highest heavens, there to receive gifts for men, to raise up our affections thither, and to prepare a place for us, where himself is, and shall continue, till his second coming at the end of the world. QUEST. LIV. How is Christ exalted…

Q54. How is Christ exalted in his sitting at the right hand of God?

Christ is exalted in his sitting at the right hand of God, in that as God-man he is advanced to the highest favor with God the Father, with all fulness of joy, glory, and power over all things in heaven and earth; and doth gather and defend his church, and subdue their enemies; furnisheth his ministers and people with gifts and graces, and maketh intercession for them.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited Phil. 2:9 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 9 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WSC Q21 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. WCF 8.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WSC Q21 · WCF 8.1 · HC Q29 · HC Q37 · BC 5.2 · BC 5.3 · BC 5.4 · BC 5.5 · BC 5.6 · CD 2.1 · 1689 8.1

Leader's notes

A Body of Divinity (Thomas Ridgley): Quest. LIII., LIV. QUEST. LIII. How was Christ exalted in his ascension? ANSW. Christ was exalted in his ascension, in that having, after his resurrection, often appeared unto, and conversed with his apostles, speaking to them of those things pertaining to the kingdom of God, and giving them commission to preach the gospel to all nations; forty days after his resurrection, he, in our nature, and as our Head, triumphing over enemies, visibly went up into the highest heavens, there to receive gifts for men, to raise up our affections thither, and to prepare a place for us, where himself is, and shall continue, till his second coming at the end of the world. QUEST. LIV. How is Christ exalted…

Q55. How doth Christ make intercession?

Christ maketh intercession, by his appearing in our nature continually before the Father in heaven, in the merit of his obedience and sacrifice on earth, declaring his will to have it applied to all believers; answering all accusations against them, and procuring for them quiet of conscience, notwithstanding daily failings, access with boldness to the throne of grace, and acceptance of their persons and services.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited Heb. 9:12,24 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 10 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WSC Q21 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. WCF 8.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WSC Q21 · WCF 8.1 · HC Q29 · HC Q37 · BC 5.2 · BC 5.3 · BC 5.4 · BC 5.5 · BC 5.6 · CD 2.1 · 1689 8.1

Leader's notes

A Body of Divinity (Thomas Ridgley): Quest. LV. QUEST. LV. How doth Christ make intercession? ANSW. Christ maketh intercession, by his appearing in our nature, continually before the Father in heaven, in the merit of his obedience and sacrifice on earth, declaring his will to have it applied to all believers, answering all accusations against them, procuring for them quiet of conscience, notwithstanding daily failings, access with boldness to the throne of grace, and acceptance of their persons and services. The intercession of Christ, as has been observed, under a foregoing answer, is a branch of his priestly office, and is founded on his satisfaction. The reason why it is mentioned in this place, after we have had an account of his death, resurrection, and ascension…

Q56. How is Christ to be exalted in his coming again to judge the world?

Christ is to be exalted in his coming again to judge the world, in that he, who was unjustly judged and condemned by wicked men, shall come again at the last day in great power, and in the full manifestation of his own glory, and of his Father's, with all his holy angels, with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trumpet of God, to judge the world in righteousness.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited Acts 3:14-15 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 6 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WSC Q21 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. WCF 8.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WSC Q21 · WCF 8.1 · HC Q29 · HC Q37 · BC 5.2 · BC 5.3 · BC 5.4 · BC 5.5 · BC 5.6 · CD 2.1 · 1689 8.1

Leader's notes

A Body of Divinity (Thomas Ridgley): Quest. LVI. QUEST. LVI. How is Christ to be exalted in his coming again to judge the world? ANSW. Christ is to be exalted in his coming again to judge the world, in that he, who was unjustly judged and condemned by wicked men, shall come again at the last day, in great power, and in the full manifestation of his own glory, and of his Father’s, with all his holy angels, with a shout, with the voice of the arch-angel, and with the trumpet of God, to judge the world in righteousness. Our Saviour being in his exalted state, is to continue at the right hand of God, till he has finished the remaining part of his work, in…