WLC 38

Westminster Larger Catechism

Q38. Why was it requisite that the Mediator should be God?

It was requisite that the Mediator should be God, that he might sustain and keep the human nature from sinking under the infinite wrath of God, and the power of death; give worth and efficacy to his sufferings, obedience, and intercession; and to satisfy God's justice, procure his favor, purchase a peculiar people, give his Spirit to them, conquer all their enemies, and bring them to everlasting salvation.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited Acts 2:24-25 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 15 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WSC Q21 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. HC Q29 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WSC Q21 · HC Q29 · HC Q37 · BC 5.2 · BC 5.3 · BC 5.4 · BC 5.5 · BC 5.6 · CD 2.1 · 1689 8.1

Leader's notes

A Body of Divinity (Thomas Ridgley): Quest. XXXVIII., XXXIX., XL. QUEST. XXXVIII. Why was it requisite that the Mediator should be God? ANSW. It was requisite that the Mediator should be God, that he might sustain and keep the human nature from sinking under the infinite wrath of God, and the power of death, give worth and efficacy to his sufferings, obedience, and intercession; and so satisfy God’s justice, procure his favour, purchase a peculiar people, give his Spirit to them, conquer all their enemies, and bring them to everlasting salvation. QUEST. XXXIX. Why was it requisite that the Mediator should be Man? ANSW. It was requisite that the Mediator should be Man, that he might advance our nature, perform obedience to the law, suffer, and…