Of the Fall of Man, of Sin, and of the Punishment thereof

Westminster Confession of Faith · 6.1–6.6

6.1. Of the Fall of Man, of Sin, and of the Punishment thereof

Our first parents, being seduced by the subtilty and temptation of Satan, sinned, in eating the forbidden fruit. This their sin God was pleased, according to His wise and holy counsel, to permit, having purposed to order it to His own glory.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited Gen. 3:13 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 3 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WSC Q13 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. WSC Q15 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WSC Q13 · WSC Q15 · WLC Q21 · HC Q3 · BC 4.1 · BC 4.2

Leader's notes

A Commentary on the Confession of Faith (A.A. Hodge): this Section proceeds to teach : 1st. That they sinned. 2d. That the particular sin they committed was their eating the forbidden fruit. 3d. That they were seduced thereto by the subtlety and temptation of Satan. 4th. That this sin was permissively embraced in the sovereign purpose of God. 6th. That in so doing God designed to order it to his own glory. 1st. Our first parents sinned. 2d. The particular sin they committed was their eating the forbidden fruit. It appears to be God^s general plan, and one eminently wise and righteous, to introduce all the newcreated subje(;ts of moral government into a state of probation for a time, in which he makes their permanent character and destiny depend…

An Exposition of the Confession of Faith (Robert Shaw): That man is now in a very corrupt and sinful state, universal experience and observation attest. That he was not originally formed in this degraded state might be inferred from the character of his Maker ; and the Scriptures explicitly affirm that he was at first created in the image of God — in a state of perfect rectitude. The question then arises, How was moral evil introduced into the world ? To this important question reason can give no satisfactory answer. Pagan philosophers could not fail to observe the degeneracy of human nature ; mournful experience taught them that evil had come into the world ; but to assign the source of evil, was knowledge too wonderful for them…

6.2. Of the Fall of Man, of Sin, and of the Punishment thereof

By this sin they fell from their original righteousness and communion, with God, and so became dead in sin, and wholly defiled in all the parts and faculties of soul and body.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited Gen. 3:6, 7, 8 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 9 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WSC Q13 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. WSC Q15 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WSC Q13 · WSC Q15 · WLC Q21 · WLC Q25 · HC Q3 · BC 4.1 · BC 4.2 · 1689 6.1 · 1689 6.2 · 1689 6.3 · 1689 6.4 · 1689 6.5 · SC60 2.2 · IAR 4.5 · SHC 2.3 · SHC 2.4 · SD 6.1

Leader's notes

A Commentary on the Confession of Faith (A.A. Hodge): This Section teaches what w^ere the consequences of this first sin upon its immediate authors. In doing so it affirms — 1st. That by this sin they were immediately cut off from communion with God. 2d. That consequently they lost their original righteousness. 3d. At the same time they became dead in sin and ivholly defiled. 152 C()NFESSIO^' OF FAITH. 4th. That this moral corruption extended to all the faculties and parts of soul and body. As a natural being man depends upon the same sustaining power of God that providentially sustains all things in being. But as a moral and religious being he depends upon the intimate and loving communion of God's Spirit for spiritual life, and consequently for…

An Exposition of the Confession of Faith (Robert Shaw): This section points out the consequences of the sin of our first parents, in regard to themselves. They " fell from their * Principal Blackwell's Sacred Scheme, p. 199. t Belfrage's Exposition of the Shorter Catechism, vol. i., p. 178. t Dwight's Theology, Serm. 27. original righteousness," and became wholly corrupted in all the faculties of their souls and members of their bodies. The understanding, once a lamp of light, was now overwhelmed in darkness. The will, once faithful for God, and regulated by his will, now became perverse and rebellious. The affections, once pure and regular, novv became vitiated and disordered. The body, too, was corrupted, and its members became instruments of unrighteousness unto sin. Our first parents likewise…

6.3. Of the Fall of Man, of Sin, and of the Punishment thereof

They being the root of all mankind, the guilt of this sin was imputed, and the same death in sin and corrupted nature conveyed, to all their posterity descending from them by ordinary generation.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited Gen. 1:27, 28 & Gen. 2:16, 17 and Acts 17:26 with Rom. 5:12, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 1 Cor. 15:21, 22, 49 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 4 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WSC Q16 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. WSC Q17 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WSC Q16 · WSC Q17 · WSC Q18 · WLC Q22 · WLC Q26 · WLC Q21 · WSC Q13 · BC 4.1 · BC 4.2 · HC Q3 · 1689 6.1 · 1689 6.2 · 1689 6.3 · 1689 6.4 · 1689 6.5 · SD 6.1 · IAR 4.5 · SC60 2.2 · SHC 2.3 · SHC 2.4

Leader's notes

A Commentary on the Confession of Faith (A.A. Hodge): These Sections teach us what were the consequences of the first sin to the descendants of its authors. In doing so our standards affirm — 1st. That Adam was both the natural and federal head of all mankind. Conf. Faith, ch. vii., § 2, and L. Cat., Qs. 22, 25, and S. Cat., Qs. 16, 18. 2d. That consequently the guilt or liability to the penal consequences of that sin was imputed, charged to the account of, and at their birth actually inflicted upon all men. 3d. That consequenMy the moral corruption which results from the penal withdrawing of God's Holy Spirit in the case of our first parents, is necessarily conveyed to all those of their descendants who are…

An Exposition of the Confession of Faith (Robert Shaw): These sections point out the consequences of the sin of our first parents in regard to their posterity. These consequences are restricted to those " descending from them by ordinary generation." This restriction is obviously introduced in order to exclude our Lord Jesus Christ, who, as man, was one of the posterity of Adam, but did not descend from him by ordinary generation. The genealogy of Christ is traced up to Adam (Luke iii. 38), but his human nature was supernaturally framed in the womb of the Virgin, by the power of the Holy Ghost. — Luke i. 35. In his birth, therefore, as well as in his life, he was " holy, harmless, undefiled, and separated from sinners." But…

6.4. Of the Fall of Man, of Sin, and of the Punishment thereof

From this original corruption, whereby we are utterly indisposed, disabled, and made opposite to all good, and wholly inclined to all evil, do proceed all actual transgressions.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited Rom. 5:6 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 9 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WSC Q18 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. WSC Q19 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WSC Q18 · WSC Q19 · WLC Q25 · WLC Q26 · WLC Q27 · WLC Q21 · WSC Q13 · BC 4.1 · BC 4.2 · HC Q3 · 1689 6.1 · 1689 6.2 · 1689 6.3 · 1689 6.4 · 1689 6.5 · SD 6.1 · IAR 4.5 · SC60 2.2 · SHC 2.3 · SHC 2.4

Leader's notes

A Commentary on the Confession of Faith (A.A. Hodge): These Sections teach us what were the consequences of the first sin to the descendants of its authors. In doing so our standards affirm — 1st. That Adam was both the natural and federal head of all mankind. Conf. Faith, ch. vii., § 2, and L. Cat., Qs. 22, 25, and S. Cat., Qs. 16, 18. 2d. That consequently the guilt or liability to the penal consequences of that sin was imputed, charged to the account of, and at their birth actually inflicted upon all men. 3d. That consequenMy the moral corruption which results from the penal withdrawing of God's Holy Spirit in the case of our first parents, is necessarily conveyed to all those of their descendants who are…

An Exposition of the Confession of Faith (Robert Shaw): These sections point out the consequences of the sin of our first parents in regard to their posterity. These consequences are restricted to those " descending from them by ordinary generation." This restriction is obviously introduced in order to exclude our Lord Jesus Christ, who, as man, was one of the posterity of Adam, but did not descend from him by ordinary generation. The genealogy of Christ is traced up to Adam (Luke iii. 38), but his human nature was supernaturally framed in the womb of the Virgin, by the power of the Holy Ghost. — Luke i. 35. In his birth, therefore, as well as in his life, he was " holy, harmless, undefiled, and separated from sinners." But…

6.5. Of the Fall of Man, of Sin, and of the Punishment thereof

This corruption of nature, during this life, doth remain in those that are regenerated; and although it be, through Christ, pardoned and mortified, yet both itself and all the motions thereof are truly and properly sin.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited 1 John 1:8, 10 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 7 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WSC Q13 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. WSC Q17 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WSC Q13 · WSC Q17 · WSC Q19 · WLC Q21 · WLC Q27 · HC Q3 · BC 4.1 · BC 4.2 · 1689 6.1 · 1689 6.2 · 1689 6.3 · 1689 6.4 · 1689 6.5 · SC60 2.2 · IAR 4.5 · SHC 2.3 · SHC 2.4 · SD 6.1

Leader's notes

A Commentary on the Confession of Faith (A.A. Hodge): these Sections teach as to the moral state of man by nature? 47. What are the several points involved in their teaching. 48. Prove that the doctrine here taught agrees with the universal experience of men. 49. State and prove the several points taught in Scripture as to the nature, extent and time of commencement of human depravity. 60. What subjects are treated of in the fifth and sixth Sections? 51. What is taught as to the continuance and character of corruption in the regenerate ? 52. Prove that the innate and permanent tendency of the soul to sin is as truly a violation of God's law as actual transgression. 53. Prove that this "tendency to sin" and actual transgression…

An Exposition of the Confession of Faith (Robert Shaw): This section teaches us, that corruption of nature remains in those that are regenerated, and is commensurate with this life. This condemns the tenet of jChristian ■perfection ; and it is supported by the plainest declarations of Scripture. " If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us." — 1 John i. 8. Paul himself says, "Sin dwelleth in me," and affirms, that "when he would do good, evil is present with him." — Rom. vii. 17-21. It has, indeed, been disputed, whether Paul, in that chapter, describes his own feelings, or personates another. We have no doubt that Paul speaks of himself as regenerated, and describes his own state, and…

6.6. Of the Fall of Man, of Sin, and of the Punishment thereof

Every sin, both original and actual, being a transgression of the righteous law of God, and contrary thereunto, doth, in its own nature, bring guilt upon the sinner; whereby he is bound over to the wrath of God, and curse of the law, and so made subject to death, with all miseries spiritual, temporal, and eternal.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited 1 John 3:4 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 10 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WSC Q19 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. WSC Q84 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WSC Q19 · WSC Q84 · WLC Q28 · WLC Q29 · WLC Q152 · WLC Q21 · WSC Q13 · BC 4.1 · BC 4.2 · HC Q3 · 1689 6.1 · 1689 6.2 · 1689 6.3 · 1689 6.4 · 1689 6.5 · SD 6.1 · IAR 4.5 · SC60 2.2 · SHC 2.3 · SHC 2.4

Leader's notes

A Commentary on the Confession of Faith (A.A. Hodge): these Sections teach as to the moral state of man by nature? 47. What are the several points involved in their teaching. 48. Prove that the doctrine here taught agrees with the universal experience of men. 49. State and prove the several points taught in Scripture as to the nature, extent and time of commencement of human depravity. 60. What subjects are treated of in the fifth and sixth Sections? 51. What is taught as to the continuance and character of corruption in the regenerate ? 52. Prove that the innate and permanent tendency of the soul to sin is as truly a violation of God's law as actual transgression. 53. Prove that this "tendency to sin" and actual transgression…

An Exposition of the Confession of Faith (Robert Shaw): This section relates to the cleseit of sin. Being a transgression of the law of God, it must, in its own nature, bring guilt upon the sinner, or render him liable to punishment. '^ It exposes him to the irrath of God, for " the children of disobedience " are also " children of wrath," i. e., they deserve and are obnoxious to the wrath of God. It subjects him to j the curse of the law, by which we may undei-stand the con- * Burnet on the Thirty- Nine Articloa, Art. 9. Hill's Lectures in Divinity vo3. ii., p. 16. demnatory sentence of the broken law, which binds over the guilty sinner to all the direful effects of the…