Of God's Covenant with Man

Westminster Confession of Faith · 7.1–7.6

7.1. Of God’s Covenant with Man

The distance between God and the creature is so great, that although reasonable creatures do owe obedience unto Him as their Creator, yet they could never have any fruition of Him as their blessedness and reward, but by some voluntary condescension on God’s part, which He hath been pleased to express by way of covenant.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited Isa. 40:13, 14, 15, 16, 17 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 9 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WSC Q12 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. WSC Q20 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WSC Q12 · WSC Q20 · WLC Q20 · WLC Q30 · WLC Q31 · HC Q29 · BC 5.2 · BC 5.3 · BC 5.4 · BC 5.5 · BC 5.6 · SC60 2.2 · IAR 4.5 · SHC 2.3 · SHC 2.4

Leader's notes

A Commentary on the Confession of Faith (A.A. Hodge): These Sections teach the following propositions : 1st. The duty which an intelligent creature owes its Creator is essential and inalienable from its being. 2d. The enjoyment of the Creator's fulness and love by the creature, however, is a matter of free and sovereign grace, depending solely on the will of the Creator. 3d. In the case of men and angels, God has been pleased to promise this transcendent benefit upon certain conditions, which conditional promise is called a covenant. 4th. In the first covenant that concerned mankind, God dealt with Adam as the representative of all his descendants. 5th. The promise of this covenant was life ; the condition of it perfect and personal obedience. 1st. The duty which…

An Exposition of the Confession of Faith (Robert Shaw): Man is naturally and necessarily under a law to God. This results from the necessary and unalterable relation subsisting between God and man, as the one is the Creator, and the other his creature. God might, therefore, if he had pleased, demanded all possible obedience of man, without making any promise securing his establishment in a state of innocence and enjoyment, and his advancement to a state of still higher felicity, as the reward of his obedience. And though man had gone tlirough a long course of obedience, without a single failure, he could not have laid his Creator under any obligation to him, or been entitled to any recompense. But God graciously condescended to deal with man by way…

7.2. Of God’s Covenant with Man

The first covenant made with man was a covenant of works, wherein life was promised to Adam, and in him to his posterity, upon condition of perfect and personal obedience.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited Gal. 3:12 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 4 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WSC Q12 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. WSC Q20 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WSC Q12 · WSC Q20 · WLC Q30 · WLC Q31 · WLC Q33 · BC 5.2 · BC 5.3 · BC 5.4 · BC 5.5 · BC 5.6 · HC Q29 · 1689 7.1 · 1689 7.2 · 1689 7.3 · SD 7.1 · SD 7.2 · SD 7.3 · SD 7.4 · SD 7.5 · IAR 4.5 · SC60 2.2 · SHC 2.3 · SHC 2.4 · IAR 5.1 · IAR 5.2 · IAR 5.3 · IAR 5.4 · IAR 5.5 · SC60 3.1 · SHC 3.2

Leader's notes

A Commentary on the Confession of Faith (A.A. Hodge): These Sections teach the following propositions : 1st. The duty which an intelligent creature owes its Creator is essential and inalienable from its being. 2d. The enjoyment of the Creator's fulness and love by the creature, however, is a matter of free and sovereign grace, depending solely on the will of the Creator. 3d. In the case of men and angels, God has been pleased to promise this transcendent benefit upon certain conditions, which conditional promise is called a covenant. 4th. In the first covenant that concerned mankind, God dealt with Adam as the representative of all his descendants. 5th. The promise of this covenant was life ; the condition of it perfect and personal obedience. 1st. The duty which…

An Exposition of the Confession of Faith (Robert Shaw): Man is naturally and necessarily under a law to God. This results from the necessary and unalterable relation subsisting between God and man, as the one is the Creator, and the other his creature. God might, therefore, if he had pleased, demanded all possible obedience of man, without making any promise securing his establishment in a state of innocence and enjoyment, and his advancement to a state of still higher felicity, as the reward of his obedience. And though man had gone tlirough a long course of obedience, without a single failure, he could not have laid his Creator under any obligation to him, or been entitled to any recompense. But God graciously condescended to deal with man by way…

7.3. Of God’s Covenant with Man

Man by his fall having made himself incapable of life by that covenant, the Lord was pleased to make a second, commonly called the covenant of grace; wherein He freely offereth unto sinners life and salvation by Jesus Christ, requiring of them faith in Him, that they may be saved, and promising to give unto all those that are ordained unto life His Holy Spirit, to make them willing and able to believe.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited Gal. 3:21 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 11 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WSC Q20 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. WLC Q31 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WSC Q20 · WLC Q31 · WLC Q32 · WLC Q30 · BC 5.2 · BC 5.3 · BC 5.4 · BC 5.5 · BC 5.6 · HC Q29 · 1689 7.1 · 1689 7.2 · 1689 7.3 · SD 7.1 · SD 7.2 · SD 7.3 · SD 7.4 · SD 7.5 · IAR 4.5 · SC60 2.2 · SHC 2.3 · SHC 2.4 · IAR 5.1 · IAR 5.2 · IAR 5.3 · IAR 5.4 · IAR 5.5 · SC60 3.1 · SHC 3.2

Leader's notes

A Commentary on the Confession of Faith (A.A. Hodge): these Sections teaches how that same covenant is administered by Christ to his people. The doctrine of our Standards and of Scripture may be stated in the following propositions : 1st. At the basis of human redemption there is an eternal covenant or personal counsel between the Father, representing the entire Godhead, and the Son, who is to assume in the fulness of time a human element into his peTBon, and to represent all his elect as their Mediator and Surety. The Scriptures make it very plain that the Father and Son had a definite understanding (a) as to who were to be saved, (6) as to what Christ must do in order to save them, (c) as to how…

An Exposition of the Confession of Faith (Robert Shaw): In entering upon the exposition of this section, it is proper to remark, that, at the period when our Confession was framed, it was generally held by the most eminent divines, that there are two covenants connected with the salvation of men, which they called the covenant of redemption, and the covenant of grace; the former made with Christ from everlasting, the latter made with sinners in time ; the righteousness of Christ being the condition of the former, and faith the condition of the latter covenant. This distinction, we conceive, has no foundation in the Sacred Scriptures, and it has long since been abandoned by all evangelical divines. The first Adam is said to have been a. figure of…

7.4. Of God’s Covenant with Man

This covenant of grace is frequently set forth in Scripture by the name of a Testament, in reference to the death of Jesus Christ the Testator, and to the everlasting inheritance, with all things belonging to it, therein bequeathed.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited Heb. 9:15, 16, 17 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 4 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WSC Q20 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. WLC Q32 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WSC Q20 · WLC Q32 · WLC Q34 · WLC Q30 · BC 5.2 · BC 5.3 · BC 5.4 · BC 5.5 · BC 5.6 · HC Q29 · 1689 7.1 · 1689 7.2 · 1689 7.3 · SD 7.1 · SD 7.2 · SD 7.3 · SD 7.4 · SD 7.5 · IAR 4.5 · SC60 2.2 · SHC 2.3 · SHC 2.4 · IAR 5.1 · IAR 5.2 · IAR 5.3 · IAR 5.4 · IAR 5.5 · SC60 3.1 · SHC 3.2

Leader's notes

A Commentary on the Confession of Faith (A.A. Hodge): these Sections teaches how that same covenant is administered by Christ to his people. The doctrine of our Standards and of Scripture may be stated in the following propositions : 1st. At the basis of human redemption there is an eternal covenant or personal counsel between the Father, representing the entire Godhead, and the Son, who is to assume in the fulness of time a human element into his peTBon, and to represent all his elect as their Mediator and Surety. The Scriptures make it very plain that the Father and Son had a definite understanding (a) as to who were to be saved, (6) as to what Christ must do in order to save them, (c) as to how…

An Exposition of the Confession of Faith (Robert Shaw): In the authorised English version of the New Testament, the covenant of grace is frequently designated a testament; and it is generally admitted, that the original word signifies both a covenant and a testament. There is, at least, one passage in which it is most properly rendered testament, namely, Heb. ix. 16, 17. Some learned critics, indeed, have stienuously contended against the use of that term even in * Confession, ch. xi., 2. t The Larger Cateciiism, Quest. 73. this passage ; but the great majority allow that the common translation is unexceptionable.*

7.5. Of God’s Covenant with Man

This covenant was differently administered in the time of the law, and in the time of the gospel: under the law, it was administered by promises, prophecies, sacrifices, circumcision, the paschal lamb, and other types and ordinances delivered to the people of the Jews, all fore-signifying Christ to come: which were, for that time, sufficient and efficacious, through the operation of the Spirit, to instruct and build up the elect in faith in the promised Messiah, by whom they had full remission of sins, and eternal salvation; and is called, the Old Testament.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited 2 Cor. 3:6, 7, 8, 9. in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 9 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WSC Q20 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. WLC Q33 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WSC Q20 · WLC Q33 · WLC Q34 · WLC Q30 · BC 5.2 · BC 5.3 · BC 5.4 · BC 5.5 · BC 5.6 · HC Q29 · 1689 7.1 · 1689 7.2 · 1689 7.3 · SD 7.1 · SD 7.2 · SD 7.3 · SD 7.4 · SD 7.5 · IAR 4.5 · SC60 2.2 · SHC 2.3 · SHC 2.4 · IAR 5.1 · IAR 5.2 · IAR 5.3 · IAR 5.4 · IAR 5.5 · SC60 3.1 · SHC 3.2

Leader's notes

A Commentary on the Confession of Faith (A.A. Hodge): These Sections teach — 1st. That the covenant of grace has from the beginning remained in all essential respects the same, in spite of all outward changes in the mode of its administration. 2d. That under the old dispensation, this covenant was administered chiefly by types and symbolical ordinances, signifying beforehand a Christ to come, and this administration was almost exclusively confined to the Jewish nation. 3d. That the new dispensation of this covenant is characterized by its superior simplicity, clearness, fulness, certainty, spiritual power and range of application. 1st. The covenant administered in both dispensations is in all essential respects the same. (1.) Christ was the Saviour of men before his advent, and he saved them on the same…

An Exposition of the Confession of Faith (Robert Shaw): The doctrines laid down in these sections are the following:— 1. That there are not two covenants of grace, diifering in * The reader will find a summary of the views of critics on this subject in a long and able article by Dr Eraser, appended to his Translation of Witsius* Dissertations on the Apostles' Creed, vol. i., note 42. The learned Professor Stuart of Andover (in his Commentary on the Hebrews) also mentions the commentators who prefer the word covenant in the p;tssap;e referred to, arid declares that " his difficulties in admitting it are insuperable." 04 CONFESSION OF FAITH. [^CHAP. VII. substance, but that the Old and New Testament economies are only two dispensations of the same covenant…

7.6. Of God’s Covenant with Man

Under the gospel, when Christ, the substance, was exhibited, the ordinances in which this covenant is dispensed are the preaching of the Word, and the administration of the sacraments of Baptism and the Lord’s Supper: which, though fewer in number, and administered with more simplicity, and less outward glory; yet, in them, it is held forth in more fulness, evidence, and spiritual efficacy, to all nations, both Jews and Gentiles; and is called the New Testament. There are not therefore two covenants of grace, differing in substance, but one and the same, under various dispensations.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited Col. 2:17 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 13 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WSC Q20 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. WLC Q35 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WSC Q20 · WLC Q35 · WLC Q30 · BC 5.2 · BC 5.3 · BC 5.4 · BC 5.5 · BC 5.6 · HC Q29 · 1689 7.1 · 1689 7.2 · 1689 7.3 · SD 7.1 · SD 7.2 · SD 7.3 · SD 7.4 · SD 7.5 · IAR 4.5 · SC60 2.2 · SHC 2.3 · SHC 2.4 · IAR 5.1 · IAR 5.2 · IAR 5.3 · IAR 5.4 · IAR 5.5 · SC60 3.1 · SHC 3.2

Leader's notes

A Commentary on the Confession of Faith (A.A. Hodge): These Sections teach — 1st. That the covenant of grace has from the beginning remained in all essential respects the same, in spite of all outward changes in the mode of its administration. 2d. That under the old dispensation, this covenant was administered chiefly by types and symbolical ordinances, signifying beforehand a Christ to come, and this administration was almost exclusively confined to the Jewish nation. 3d. That the new dispensation of this covenant is characterized by its superior simplicity, clearness, fulness, certainty, spiritual power and range of application. 1st. The covenant administered in both dispensations is in all essential respects the same. (1.) Christ was the Saviour of men before his advent, and he saved them on the same…

An Exposition of the Confession of Faith (Robert Shaw): The doctrines laid down in these sections are the following:— 1. That there are not two covenants of grace, diifering in * The reader will find a summary of the views of critics on this subject in a long and able article by Dr Eraser, appended to his Translation of Witsius* Dissertations on the Apostles' Creed, vol. i., note 42. The learned Professor Stuart of Andover (in his Commentary on the Hebrews) also mentions the commentators who prefer the word covenant in the p;tssap;e referred to, arid declares that " his difficulties in admitting it are insuperable." 04 CONFESSION OF FAITH. [^CHAP. VII. substance, but that the Old and New Testament economies are only two dispensations of the same covenant…