Of Christian Liberty, and Liberty of Conscience

Westminster Confession of Faith · 20.1–20.4

20.1. Of Christian Liberty, and Liberty of Conscience

The liberty which Christ hath purchased for believers under the Gospel consists in their freedom from the guilt of sin, and condemning wrath of God, the curse of the moral law; and, in their being delivered from this present evil world, bondage to Satan, and dominion of sin; from the evil of afflictions, the sting of death, the victory of the grave, and everlasting damnation; as also, in their free access to God, and their yielding obedience unto Him, not out of slavish fear, but a child-like love and willing mind. All which were common also to believers under the law. But, under the new testament, the liberty of Christians is further enlarged, in their freedom from the yoke of the ceremonial law, to which the Jewish Church was subjected; and in greater boldness of access to the throne of grace, and in fuller communications of the free Spirit of God, than believers under the law did ordinarily partake of.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited Tit. 2:14 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 22 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. IAR 6.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. SHC 4.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

IAR 6.1 · SHC 4.1 · SHC 4.2

Leader's notes

A Commentary on the Confession of Faith (A.A. Hodge): These Sections teach the following propositions : 1st. God alone is Lord of the human conscience, which is responsible only to his authority. 2d. God has authoritatively addressed the human conscience only in his law, the only perfect revelation of which in this world is the inspired Scriptures. Hence God himself has set the human conscience free from all obligation to believe or obey any such doctrines or comCHEISTIAN LIBERTY— LIBERTY OF CONSCIEKOE. 359 mand merits of men as are either contrary to or aside from the teachings of that Word. 3d. Hence to believe such doctrines, or to obey such commandments as a matter of conscience, is to be guilty of the sin of betraying the liberty of conscience…

An Exposition of the Confession of Faith (Robert Shaw): -Civil liberty is justly esteemed an invaluable privilege, and no sacrifice is deemed too great in order to recover it when lost, or to secure it when enjoyed. But vakiahle as civil liberty is, it cannot be questioned that the hberty wherewith Christ makes his people free is much to be preferred. In proportion to the vahie of the soul above the body, so must the liberty that respects the one surpass that which merely relates to the other. Those whom Christ makes free are free indeed. — John viii. 36. Christian liberty may be considered, either as common to believers in every age, or as a special immunity of the children of God under the New Testament dispensation. That…

20.2. Of Christian Liberty, and Liberty of Conscience

God alone is Lord of the conscience, and hath left it free from the doctrines and commandments of men, which are in any thing contrary to His Word; or beside it, if matters of faith or worship. So that, to believe such doctrines, or to obey such commands, out of conscience, is to betray true liberty of conscience: and the requiring of an implicit faith, and an absolute and blind obedience is to destroy liberty of conscience, and reason also.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited Jam. 4:12 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 20 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. IAR 6.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. SHC 4.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

IAR 6.1 · SHC 4.1 · SHC 4.2

Leader's notes

A Commentary on the Confession of Faith (A.A. Hodge): These Sections teach the following propositions : 1st. God alone is Lord of the human conscience, which is responsible only to his authority. 2d. God has authoritatively addressed the human conscience only in his law, the only perfect revelation of which in this world is the inspired Scriptures. Hence God himself has set the human conscience free from all obligation to believe or obey any such doctrines or comCHEISTIAN LIBERTY— LIBERTY OF CONSCIEKOE. 359 mand merits of men as are either contrary to or aside from the teachings of that Word. 3d. Hence to believe such doctrines, or to obey such commandments as a matter of conscience, is to be guilty of the sin of betraying the liberty of conscience…

An Exposition of the Confession of Faith (Robert Shaw): In this section the doctrine of liberty of conscience is laid I down in most explicit terms. The conscience, in all matters of faith and duty, is subject to the authority of God alone, and entirely free from all subjection to the traditions and commandments of men. To believe any doctrine, or obey any commandment, contrary to, or beside, the Word of God, out of submission to human authority, is to betray true liberty of conscience. And be the power and authority whose it will — be it that of a magistrate or a minister — of a husband, a master, or a parent — that would require an implicit faith and an absolute blind obedience, it would destroy liberty…

20.3. Of Christian Liberty, and Liberty of Conscience

They who, upon pretence of Christian liberty, do practice any sin, or cherish any lust, do thereby destroy the end of Christian liberty, which is, that being delivered out of the hands of our enemies, we might serve the Lord, without fear, in holiness and righteousness before Him, all the days of our life.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited Gal. 5:13 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 5 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. IAR 6.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. SHC 4.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

IAR 6.1 · SHC 4.1 · SHC 4.2

Leader's notes

A Commentary on the Confession of Faith (A.A. Hodge): These Sections teach the following propositions : 1st. God alone is Lord of the human conscience, which is responsible only to his authority. 2d. God has authoritatively addressed the human conscience only in his law, the only perfect revelation of which in this world is the inspired Scriptures. Hence God himself has set the human conscience free from all obligation to believe or obey any such doctrines or comCHEISTIAN LIBERTY— LIBERTY OF CONSCIEKOE. 359 mand merits of men as are either contrary to or aside from the teachings of that Word. 3d. Hence to believe such doctrines, or to obey such commandments as a matter of conscience, is to be guilty of the sin of betraying the liberty of conscience…

An Exposition of the Confession of Faith (Robert Shaw): The liberty pleaded for in our Confession is not absolute and uncontrollable. To assert that men have a right to think and act as they please, without respect to the moral law, and without being responsible to God, would be atheistical. And, if men are considered as socially united, and as placed under government, their natural rights, in religious as well as in civil things, must be Hable to restraint and regulations, so far as the interests and>Bnds of society require. Accordingly, the Confession, in the above sections, proceeds to guard the doctrine of liberty of conscience against abuse, first, in refer- .- ence to the authority of God in his law ; and, secondly ^ in reference to the…

20.4. Of Christian Liberty, and Liberty of Conscience

And because the powers which God hath ordained, and the liberty which Christ hath purchased, are not intended by God to destroy, but mutually to uphold and preserve one another; they who, upon pretence of Christian liberty, shall oppose any lawful power, or the lawful exercise of it, whether it be civil or ecclesiastical, resist the ordinance of God. And, for their publishing of such opinions, or maintaining of such practices, as are contrary to the light of nature, or to the known principles of Christianity, whether concerning faith, worship, or conversation; or, to the power of godliness; or, such erroneous opinions or practices, as either in their own nature, or in the manner of publishing or maintaining them, are destructive to the external peace and order which Christ hath established in the Church, they may lawfully be called to account, and proceeded against by the censures of the Church, and by the power of the civil magistrate.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited Matt. 12:25 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 21 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. IAR 6.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. SHC 4.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

IAR 6.1 · SHC 4.1 · SHC 4.2

Leader's notes

A Commentary on the Confession of Faith (A.A. Hodge): These Sections teach the following propositions : 1st. God alone is Lord of the human conscience, which is responsible only to his authority. 2d. God has authoritatively addressed the human conscience only in his law, the only perfect revelation of which in this world is the inspired Scriptures. Hence God himself has set the human conscience free from all obligation to believe or obey any such doctrines or comCHEISTIAN LIBERTY— LIBERTY OF CONSCIEKOE. 359 mand merits of men as are either contrary to or aside from the teachings of that Word. 3d. Hence to believe such doctrines, or to obey such commandments as a matter of conscience, is to be guilty of the sin of betraying the liberty of conscience…

An Exposition of the Confession of Faith (Robert Shaw): The liberty pleaded for in our Confession is not absolute and uncontrollable. To assert that men have a right to think and act as they please, without respect to the moral law, and without being responsible to God, would be atheistical. And, if men are considered as socially united, and as placed under government, their natural rights, in religious as well as in civil things, must be Hable to restraint and regulations, so far as the interests and>Bnds of society require. Accordingly, the Confession, in the above sections, proceeds to guard the doctrine of liberty of conscience against abuse, first, in refer- .- ence to the authority of God in his law ; and, secondly ^ in reference to the…