WCF 7.1

Westminster Confession of Faith

7.1. Of God’s Covenant with Man

The distance between God and the creature is so great, that although reasonable creatures do owe obedience unto Him as their Creator, yet they could never have any fruition of Him as their blessedness and reward, but by some voluntary condescension on God’s part, which He hath been pleased to express by way of covenant.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited Isa. 40:13, 14, 15, 16, 17 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 9 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WSC Q12 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. WSC Q20 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WSC Q12 · WSC Q20 · WLC Q20 · WLC Q30 · WLC Q31 · HC Q29 · BC 5.2 · BC 5.3 · BC 5.4 · BC 5.5 · BC 5.6 · SC60 2.2 · IAR 4.5 · SHC 2.3 · SHC 2.4

Leader's notes

A Commentary on the Confession of Faith (A.A. Hodge): These Sections teach the following propositions : 1st. The duty which an intelligent creature owes its Creator is essential and inalienable from its being. 2d. The enjoyment of the Creator's fulness and love by the creature, however, is a matter of free and sovereign grace, depending solely on the will of the Creator. 3d. In the case of men and angels, God has been pleased to promise this transcendent benefit upon certain conditions, which conditional promise is called a covenant. 4th. In the first covenant that concerned mankind, God dealt with Adam as the representative of all his descendants. 5th. The promise of this covenant was life ; the condition of it perfect and personal obedience. 1st. The duty which…

An Exposition of the Confession of Faith (Robert Shaw): Man is naturally and necessarily under a law to God. This results from the necessary and unalterable relation subsisting between God and man, as the one is the Creator, and the other his creature. God might, therefore, if he had pleased, demanded all possible obedience of man, without making any promise securing his establishment in a state of innocence and enjoyment, and his advancement to a state of still higher felicity, as the reward of his obedience. And though man had gone tlirough a long course of obedience, without a single failure, he could not have laid his Creator under any obligation to him, or been entitled to any recompense. But God graciously condescended to deal with man by way…