WCF 24.4

Westminster Confession of Faith

24.4. Of Marriage and Divorce

Marriage ought not to be within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity forbidden by the Word; nor can such incestuous marriages ever be made lawful by any law of man or consent of parties, so as those persons may live together as man and wife. The man may not marry any of his wife’s kindred nearer in blood than he may of his own; nor the woman of her husband’s kindred nearer in blood than of her own.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited Lev. 18 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 6 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WSC Q71 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. WLC Q139 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WSC Q71 · WLC Q139 · BC 9.1 · BC 9.2 · 1689 25.1 · 1689 25.2 · 1689 25.3 · 1689 25.4 · SC60 8.1 · IAR 6.12 · SHC 10.1 · SHC 10.2 · SD 25.1 · SD 25.2 · SD 25.3 · SD 25.4

Leader's notes

A Commentary on the Confession of Faith (A.A. Hodge): These Sections teach the divine law of marriage as to incest and as to divorce. 1st. Incest consists of sexual intercourse between parties forbidden by the divine law to marry, because of their relationship. Marriage between these parties is impossible; and no matter what may be the provisions of human laws or the decisions of human courts, such pretended marriages are void ab initio — invalid in essence as well as improper and injurious. Since the degrees of relationship within which marriage is excluded differ in nearness, so the crime of incest differs, according to these varying degrees, from the highest to the least measure of criminality. The obligation to avoid intermarriage between near blood-relations is a dictate of nature…

An Exposition of the Confession of Faith (Robert Shaw): In the Mosaic law marriage was expressly forbidden within certain degrees of consanguinity or affinity (Lev. xviii.); and by the laws of our country the prohibition is extended to the same degrees. Marriages contracted within these degrees are in themselves justly deemed invalid, and may properly be dissolved. Moses permitted the Jews, " because of the hardness of their hearts," to put away their wives, to prevent greater evils; but in the ^'ew Testament a divorce is only permitted in case of adultery, or of wilful and obstinate desertion. There can be no question that adultery is a just ground for " the innocent party to sue out a divorce, and, after the divorce, to raarry another, as if the…