Of Lawful Oaths and Vows

Savoy Declaration · 23.1–23.6

23.1. Of Lawful Oaths and Vows

A lawful oath is a part of religious worship, wherein the person swearing in truth, righteousness and judgment, solemnly calleth God to witness what he asserteth or promiseth, and to judge him according to the truth or falsehood of what he sweareth.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited Deut. 10:20 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 4 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WCF 22.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WCF 22.1

23.2. Of Lawful Oaths and Vows

The name of God only is that by which men ought to swear, and therein it is to be used with all holy fear and reverence. Therefore to swear vainly, or rashly, by that glorious or dreadful name, or to swear at all by any other thing, is sinful and to be abhorred. Yet as in matters of weight and moment an oath is warranted by the Word of God under the New Testament, as well as under the Old; so a lawful oath, being imposed by lawful authority in such matters, ought to be taken.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited Deut. 6:13 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 11 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WCF 22.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. 1689 23.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WCF 22.1 · 1689 23.1 · 1689 23.2 · 1689 23.3 · 1689 23.4 · 1689 23.5

23.3. Of Lawful Oaths and Vows

Whosoever taketh an oath, warranted by the Word of God, ought duly to consider the weightiness of so solemn an act, and therein to avouch nothing but what he is fully persuaded is the truth: neither may any man bind himself by oath to any thing, but what is good and just, and what he believeth so to be, and what he is able and resolved to perform. Yet it is a sin to refuse an oath touching any thing that is good and just, being lawfully imposed by authority.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited Exod. 20:7 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 6 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WCF 22.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. 1689 23.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WCF 22.1 · 1689 23.1 · 1689 23.2 · 1689 23.3 · 1689 23.4 · 1689 23.5

23.4. Of Lawful Oaths and Vows

An oath is to be taken in the plain and common sense of the words, without equivocation or mental reservation. It cannot oblige to sin, but in any thing not sinful, being taken it binds to performance, although to a man's own hurt; nor is it to be violated, although made to heretics or infidels.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited Jer. 4:2 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 6 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WCF 22.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. 1689 23.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WCF 22.1 · 1689 23.1 · 1689 23.2 · 1689 23.3 · 1689 23.4 · 1689 23.5

23.5. Of Lawful Oaths and Vows

A vow, which is not to be made to any creature, but God alone, is of the like nature with a promissory oath, and ought to be made with the like religious care, and to be performed with the like faithfulness.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited Isa. 19:21 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 4 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WCF 22.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. 1689 23.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WCF 22.1 · 1689 23.1 · 1689 23.2 · 1689 23.3 · 1689 23.4 · 1689 23.5

23.6. Of Lawful Oaths and Vows

Popish monastical vows of perpetual single life, professed poverty, and regular obedience, are so far from being degrees of higher perfection, that they are superstitious and sinful snares, in which no Christian may entangle himself.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited Ps. 76:11 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 8 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WCF 22.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. 1689 23.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WCF 22.1 · 1689 23.1 · 1689 23.2 · 1689 23.3 · 1689 23.4 · 1689 23.5