Of God's Eternal Decree

Savoy Declaration · 3.1–3.8

3.1. Of God's Eternal Decree

God from all eternity did by the most wise and holy counsel of his own will, freely and unchangeably ordain whatsoever comes to pass: yet so, as thereby neither is God the author of sin, nor is violence offered to the will of the creatures, nor is the liberty or contingency of second causes taken away, but rather established.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited Eph. 1:11 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 11 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WCF 3.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WCF 3.1

3.2. Of God's Eternal Decree

Although God knows whatsoever may or can come to pass upon all supposed conditions, yet hath he not decreed any thing, because he foresaw it as future, or as that which would come to pass upon such conditions.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited Acts 15:18 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 4 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WCF 3.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. 1689 3.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WCF 3.1 · 1689 3.1

3.3. Of God's Eternal Decree

By the decree of God for the manifestation of his glory, some men and angels are predestinated unto everlasting life, and others fore-ordained to everlasting death.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited 1 Tim. 5:21 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 5 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WCF 3.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. 1689 3.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WCF 3.1 · 1689 3.1

3.4. Of God's Eternal Decree

These angels and men thus predestinated, and fore-ordained, are particularly and unchangeably designed, and their number is so certain and definite, that it cannot be either increased or diminished.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited 2 Tim. 2:19 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 2 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WCF 3.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. 1689 3.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WCF 3.1 · 1689 3.1

3.5. Of God's Eternal Decree

Those of mankind that are predestinated unto life, God, before the foundation of the world was laid, according to his eternal and immutable purpose, and the secret counsel and good pleasure of his will, hath chosen in Christ unto everlasting glory, out of his mere free grace and love, without any foresight of faith or good works, or perseverance in either of them, or any other thing in the creature, as conditions or causes moving him thereunto, and all to the praise of his glorious grace.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited Eph. 1:4, 9, 11 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 7 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WCF 3.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. 1689 3.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WCF 3.1 · 1689 3.1

3.6. Of God's Eternal Decree

As God hath appointed the elect unto glory, so hath he by the eternal and most free purpose of his will fore-ordained all the means thereunto. Wherefore they who are elected, being fallen in Adam, are redeemed by Christ, are effectually called unto faith in Christ by his Spirit working in due season, are justified, adopted, sanctified, and kept by his power, through faith, unto salvation. Neither are any other redeemed by Christ, or effectually called, justified, adopted, sanctified and saved, but the elect only.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited 1 Pet. 1:2 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 16 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WCF 3.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. 1689 3.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WCF 3.1 · 1689 3.1

3.7. Of God's Eternal Decree

The rest of mankind God was pleased, according to the unsearchable counsel of his own will, whereby he extendeth or withholdeth mercy, as he pleaseth, for the glory of his sovereign power over his creatures, to pass by and to ordain them to dishonour and wrath for their sin, to the praise of his glorious justice.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited Matt. 11:25, 26 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 5 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WCF 3.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. 1689 3.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WCF 3.1 · 1689 3.1

3.8. Of God's Eternal Decree

The doctrine of this high mystery of predestination is to be handled with special prudence and care, that men attending the will of God revealed in his Word, and yielding obedience thereunto, may from the certainty of their effectual vocation, be assured of their eternal election. So shall this doctrine afford matter of praise, reverence and admiration of God, and of humility, diligence, and abundant consolation to all that sincerely obey the Gospel.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited Rom. 9:20 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 10 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WCF 3.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. 1689 3.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WCF 3.1 · 1689 3.1