Of Marriage

1689 London Baptist Confession · 25.1–25.4

25.1. Of Marriage

Marriage is to be between one Man and one Woman; neither is it lawful for any man to have more then one Wife, nor for any Woman to have more then one Husband at the same time.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited Genesis 2:24 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 3 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WCF 24.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. BC 9.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WCF 24.1 · BC 9.1 · BC 9.2 · SD 25.1 · SD 25.2 · SD 25.3 · SD 25.4

25.2. Of Marriage

Marriage was ordained for the mutual help of Husband and Wife, for the increase of Man-kind, with a legitimate issue, and for preventing of uncleanness.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited Genesis 2:18 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 3 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WCF 24.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. BC 9.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WCF 24.1 · BC 9.1 · BC 9.2 · SD 25.1 · SD 25.2 · SD 25.3 · SD 25.4

25.3. Of Marriage

It is lawful for all sorts of people to Marry, who are able with judgment to give their consent; yet it is the duty of Christians to marry in the Lord, and therefore such as profess the true Religion, should not Marry with Infidels, or Idolaters; neither should such as are godly be unequally yoked, by marrying with such as are wicked, in their life, or maintain damnable Heresie.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited Hebrews 13:4 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 4 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WCF 24.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. BC 9.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WCF 24.1 · BC 9.1 · BC 9.2 · SD 25.1 · SD 25.2 · SD 25.3 · SD 25.4

25.4. Of Marriage

Marriage ought not to be within the degrees of consanguinity, or Affinity forbidden in the word; nor can such incestuous Marriage ever be made lawful, by any law of Man or consent of parties, so as those persons may live together as Man and Wife.

Proof texts

For discussion

  1. The Assembly cited Leviticus 18 in support of this answer. Read it in context — how does it bear on what is claimed here?
  2. 3 passages are cited here. Which does the most work, and is anything claimed that the proofs do not obviously carry?
  3. WCF 24.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?
  4. BC 9.1 treats the same ground. What does it add, and why might it put things differently?

Read alongside

WCF 24.1 · BC 9.1 · BC 9.2 · SD 25.1 · SD 25.2 · SD 25.3 · SD 25.4